CENOS : Simulation Software : Induction Heating : Radio Frequency : Wireless Charging
  • Products
    • Radio Frequency
    • Induction Heating
    • Wireless Charging
    • Electromagnetic Stirring and Pumping of Liquid Metals
    • Busbar Heating
  • Resources
    • News and articles
    • Case studies
    • User stories
    • Academic stories
    • Testimonials
  • Documentation
  • Academic
  • About
  • Contact
  • Book a demo
  • Menu Menu
Induction hardening for electric vehicles: case study

Induction hardening for electric vehicles: case study

November 12, 2024/in Case studies, Induction Heating, User testimonials

The world of electric vehicles (EVs) is evolving fast. The cars you are driving on petrol now have all-electric versions or hybrid. Most probably, the traffic we see today will turn into fully electric in upcoming years. With all that, there are multiple challenges that arise in manufacturing parts that require specific durability and efficiency standards.

Induction hardening is important in creating wear-resistant surfaces in EV components like drive joints. Over the past decades, significant investments have been made to establish production lines and supply chains for automotive parts. Now, suppliers aim to repurpose these lines to produce parts for electric vehicles (EVs). However, EVs come with different hardening requirements due to their higher torque demands, which necessitate deeper hardening.

This raises critical questions: How can suppliers redesign hardening recipes and coils to meet the needs of EVs? Can they achieve this using the same power supplies, originally designed to operate within specific frequency and power ranges?

In other words, how can the hardening process be optimized within the constraints of legacy power supplies, thereby avoiding costly capital investments?

In this particular simulation case study, we will take a closer look into how simulation can help with impedance mismatching in EV part induction hardening.

What is the challenge?

The core challenges include meeting new mechanical standards, developing specialized “heating recipes” to achieve precise hardening zones, and ensuring that impedance matches between the source (generator) and load (inductor + workpiece). Matched impedance ensures the efficiency of the setup. If the impedance is not matched, the coil gets excessive heating, and a lot of energy is wasted. So, it is about energy efficiency.

Designing coils with appropriate inductance and adjusting the system’s electrical circuit to align with the specified parameters are the first steps to maximize power transfer.

There was a production line dedicated to hardening CV joints. Now, the supplier, GKN Drivetrain Celaya in this case, aimed to supply these same CV joints for electric vehicles (EVs). However, EV manufacturers require a deeper hardening zone to accommodate the higher torque demands of EVs.

GKN Drivetrain Celaya manufacturing engineer Kevin Tovar Estrada wanted to meet these requirements without investing in costly line upgrades, instead focusing on adjusting the parameters of the hardening process.

This article explores how simulation technology aids in this process. One critical aspect is impedance matching, and simulation provides a way to measure and optimize impedance effectively, making sure that adjustments meet the new requirements without extensive physical modifications.

Unlike parts in internal combustion vehicles, EV components demand a hardening zone depth of 5 mm (0.20 in), an upgrade from the previous 3 mm (0.12 in). This increased depth requires recalibrated heating frequencies and timing, alongside precise equipment adjustments, to deliver the desired outcome.

Induction hardening for electric vehicles: case study

 

What is the solution?

Engineers and manufacturers can address challenges by using simulation software made for induction hardening. Simulation software, like CENOS, provides a practical and efficient solution for testing and optimizing parameters before committing to actual production setups.

In this case study, the simulation software plays a vital role in testing different frequencies and heating times to achieve the 5 mm hardening zone required for EV joints. Engineers can simulate adjustments such as altering the flux concentrator placement, modifying capacitor values, and fine-tuning heating frequencies.

For instance, in the EV joint hardening process, parameters shift to a lower frequency (5 kHz), maintaining 60 kW power with a slightly extended heating time (6 seconds) to achieve the correct hardening profile and depth. Simulation provides engineers with visual feedback, showing how current density shifts during the heating process, and enables fine adjustments to coil designs to match impedance accurately.

Parameters for ICV and EV joint hardening

ICV parameters:

  • 12 kHz
  • 60 kW
  • 5 sec heating time
  • Hardening zone: 3 mm (0.12 in)
  • Hardening profile: 750 °C (1382 °F)
  • Inductance range: 60-100 nH

Induction hardening for electric vehicles: case study

 

The red areas indicate regions reaching high temperatures, nearing the target hardening temperature of 750 °C (1382 °F), while the blue areas show cooler zones unaffected by the heating process. With ICV parameters of 12 kHz frequency, 60 kW power, and a 5-second heating time, this profile achieves a hardening depth of 3 mm (0.12 in), ensuring the component’s surface gains durability and wear resistance.

 

The graph shows the inductance over time during the heating process, with the inductance starting around 100 nH, then slightly decreasing and stabilizing within the target range of 60-100 nH. This variation indicates a successful impedance match between the power source and the load (inductor + workpiece) throughout the process.

Maintaining inductance in this range is crucial for optimal power transfer, ensuring that the heating is efficient and the desired hardening depth is achieved consistently.

EV parameters:

  • 5 kHz
  • 60 kW
  • 6 sec heating time

Here’s how to achieve a deeper hardening profile with 5 kHz, 6 second heating time.

 

Compared to the internal combustion vehicle (ICV) parameters, the 5 kHz frequency and extended heating time of 6 seconds result in a deeper hardening profile, visible in the more extensive red regions near the surface. This higher temperature area, exceeding 750 °C (1382 °F), indicates that the heat penetrates further, ensuring a broader and deeper hardening zone that aligns with the specifications for EV components requiring increased durability.

The inductance graph compares the EV (5 kHz) and ICV (12 kHz) settings over time. For the 5 kHz configuration, the inductance starts higher, around 120 nH, and gradually decreases to around 80 nH by the end of the 6-second heating time.

This pattern contrasts with the 12 kHz configuration, which maintains a slightly lower inductance level and stabilizes more quickly. The higher initial inductance for the 5 kHz setup allows for a more efficient power transfer, achieving the desired deeper hardening profile required for EV applications.

What is the result?

We can examine how current density changes throughout the process. The current density distribution images illustrate how the choice of frequency and heating time affects the induction heating process for EV parts. Here’s a comparison and analysis of the results across different settings.

12 kHz, 0.5 sec

  • The current density is concentrated around the edges of the part, with relatively high values (up to 4.4e+08 A/m²) near the surface and a rapid drop-off toward the interior. This indicates a shallow heating profile that primarily affects the surface, with minimal penetration into the material’s core.
  • The short heating time combined with the high frequency results in a surface-focused heating pattern, insufficient for achieving the deeper hardening profile needed for EV components.

5 kHz, 0.5 sec

  • The current density distribution at 5 kHz and 0.5 seconds is similar in profile to the 12 kHz setting but slightly less concentrated at the edges. The lower frequency causes a marginally deeper penetration, although the effect remains primarily surface-level.
  • This setup also does not meet the deeper hardening requirements for EV parts, as the short duration limits heat penetration into the material.

12 kHz, 5 sec

  • Extending the heating time to 5 seconds at 12 kHz shows a more pronounced penetration of current density compared to the initial 0.5-second setting. The current density now reaches further into the part, with red zones extending deeper, indicating increased energy absorption.
  • However, while there is an improvement in depth, the high frequency still limits the extent of penetration compared to lower-frequency settings. This setup offers better results than the shorter duration but may still fall short of EV hardening requirements.

5 kHz, 5 sec

  • At 5 kHz and 5 seconds, the current density penetrates significantly deeper into the part. The distribution shows a well-balanced spread from the surface toward the core, with values reaching around 7.8e+07 A/m².
  • This setup aligns well with the requirements for EV parts, as the combination of lower frequency and longer heating time allows for substantial depth in the hardening zone. The current density is more evenly distributed, achieving a more robust and deeper hardening profile ideal for EV component durability.

 

The simulation results indicate that for EV parts requiring a deeper hardening profile, the 5 kHz, 5-second configuration is optimal. This setup enables the current density to penetrate deeply and uniformly, creating a hardening layer that enhances part durability and meets EV-specific demands.

Using simulation technology, engineers gain critical insights into the precise dynamics of induction hardening for EV components. By simulating different setups, they can confidently adjust parameters like frequency and power, knowing these changes align with the stringent requirements of EV part specifications. This process ensures that the end product meets durability and performance standards with a deeper hardening profile essential for EV applications.

The visual analysis from simulation images further validates each stage, from initial setup to the final hardening result, showing the exact placement and behavior of components like the flux concentrator. This simulation-driven approach not only accelerates the design process but also reduces the need for costly and time-intensive physical prototypes, enabling engineers to bring efficient, reliable, and optimized EV parts to market faster.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://cenos-platform.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/induction-hardening-for-electric-vehicles-case-study.webp 1333 2000 developer /wp-content/themes/cenos/images/layout/logo.png developer2024-11-12 20:11:572024-11-14 20:17:25Induction hardening for electric vehicles: case study

Browse by Categories

  • Academic
  • Antenna Design
  • Busbar Heating
  • Case studies
  • Electromagnetic Stirring and Pumping
  • General news
  • Induction Heating
  • Radio Frequency
  • User testimonials
  • Wireless Charging

Latest in Blog

  • Catheter tipping case study: making better medical devicesApril 10, 2025 - 11:39 am
  • How simulation improves surface hardening for vice components
    How to use FreeCAD and CENOS simulation to improve surface hardening for vice componentsApril 1, 2025 - 1:09 pm
  • Optimizing solidification simulation in electromagnetic stirring applications: case study
    Optimizing solidification simulation in electromagnetic stirring applications: case studyJanuary 29, 2025 - 4:20 pm
  • Using simulation software to improve micro mobility mechanics
    Using simulation software to improve micro mobility mechanicsDecember 10, 2024 - 4:34 pm
  • Wireless charging of industrial robots: case study
    Wireless charging of industrial robots: case studyDecember 6, 2024 - 8:32 pm

We are a software company on a mission to reshape the engineering process by providing engineers of all disciplines with truly accessible simulation tools for practical work.

caotica.ee veebidisain, kodulehe disain, veebi arendus, kodulehe arendus, kodulehe tegemine, wordpress arendus caotica.ee veebidisain, kodulehe disain, veebi arendus, kodulehe arendus, kodulehe tegemine, wordpress arendus

Products

Radio Frequency
Induction Heating
Wireless Charging
Electromagnetic Stirring, Melting and Pumping of Liquid Metals
Busbar Heating

Resources

Documentation
News and articles
Case studies
Testimonials
About
Careers

Get in touch

info@cenos-platform.com

Americas

C. Héroe de Nacozari 25B-int V-2210, Centro, 76000 Santiago de Querétaro, Qro., Mexico.
(US) +1 (708) 794 4046

Europe

Zeļļu iela 23, Riga, Latvia.
(EU) +371 27819253

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
© 2017–2025 CENOS™ SIA. All Rights Reserved. caotica.eu web design, web development, digital marketing, wordpress development caotica.eu web design, web development, wordpress development, digital marketing, online marketing
  • Privacy & Data Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

AcceptSettings

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy & Data Policy
Accept settings